Misleading and deceptive conduct is a critical component of Australian Consumer Law. The prohibition against misleading and deceptive conduct is designed to ensure fair trading practices. It protects consumers and businesses from false or misleading representations.
This article was was written by our competition and consumer lawyer. We explore the legal frameworks governing misleading and deceptive conduct in Australia and key court cases.
Key Takeaways
- Section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce
- Businesses must ensure that all representations are accurate and not misleading
- Consumers have the right to truthful information and can take action if they are misled
- Upholding these laws promotes fair trading and enhances consumer confidence
Australian Consumer Law (ACL)
The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) is outlined in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. It serves as the cornerstone for consumer protection in Australia.
- Section 18 of the ACL states: “A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.”
- This provision applies to all individuals and businesses engaged in commercial activities, regardless of size
- Importantly, the law does not require proof of intent to mislead; the mere likelihood of deception is sufficient.
State and Territory Fair Trading Acts
Complementing the ACL are the State and Territory fair trading acts, which reinforce consumer protections at the local level.
- Acts like the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) and the Fair Trading Act 1999 (VIC) mirror the ACL’s provisions
- Consistent enforcement ensures that consumers and businesses across Australia are subject to the same standards regarding misleading conduct
Key Cases Shaping Australian Law
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191
This landmark case set important precedents in determining what constitutes misleading conduct. In particular, the High Court:
- emphasised evaluating the conduct in its full context and considering the target audience’s perspective
- established that misleading conduct is assessed based on the likely reaction of an ordinary and reasonable member of the public
ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640
This case highlighted the importance of clarity in advertising. In particular, the High Court:
- ruled that disclaimers must be prominent enough to dispel any misleading impressions
- advertisements should not rely on fine print to correct misleading headlines or prominent statements. It is the overall impression of the representation that matter.
Google Inc. v ACCC (2013) 249 CLR 435
This case examined liability concerning misleading advertisements in the digital space. In particular, the High Court:
- found that Google was not responsible for misleading ads created by its advertisers
- clarified that search engine providers are not publishers of the content but rather conduits
Impact on Businesses and Consumers
Impact on Businesses
Legal Obligations
Misleading and deceptive conduct provisions have far-reaching impacts on Australian businesses. Firms are required to exercise vigilance in their marketing and sales practices to ensure representations are truthful and complete. Failure to adhere to these principles can result in significant financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of consumer trust.
Businesses must exercise due diligence to ensure all commercial representations are accurate and not misleading. To avoid conduct that is misleading and deceptive, Australian businesses should ensure that:
- all promotional materials should truthfully represent products or services
- any qualifying information is prominently displayed and easy to understand
- employees are educated on compliance with the ACL to prevent inadvertent breaches
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failure to comply with the ACL can result in severe consequences. The consequences of breaching the ACL include:
- significant fines being imposed by regulatory bodies like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
- eroding consumer trust and harming brand reputation
- litigation from consumers or competitors
Impact on Consumers
Rights and protections
Consumers are empowered under the ACL to make informed decisions. The prohibition against misleading and deceptive conduct offers protection against false representations that could impact their purchasing decisions.
Consumers are empowered to take action against businesses that engage in misleading practices. Remedies are available to consumers such as cancelling the contract or receiving compensation for loss they suffer.
Taking Action
Consumers can take action such as:
- talking to the advertiser directly to try and resolve their dispute
- reporting misleading conduct to the ACCC or to the relevant State fair trading agency
- seeking professional consumer law advice to pursue formal legal action
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is considered misleading or deceptive conduct?
Any action or statement that leads, or is likely to lead, a reasonable person into error is considered misleading or deceptive. This includes false representations, exaggerated claims, or omitting important information
2. Does intent matter in cases of misleading conduct?
No, under Section 18 of the ACL, intent is not a required element. Even unintentional conduct can be deemed misleading if it has the effect or potential effect of deceiving someone.
3. How can businesses ensure compliance with the ACL?
- Regularly audit all advertisements and promotional content for accuracy.
- Educate employees about legal obligations and the importance of honesty in representations.
- Engage legal professionals to review practices and provide guidance.
- Do not mislead potential employees
4. What should consumers do if they believe they have been misled?
- Keep records of all relevant communications and representations.
- Attempt to resolve the issue directly.
- If unsatisfied, lodge a complaint with the ACCC or state fair trading agency.
- Consider consulting an eCommerce lawyer for further action.
5. Are disclaimers enough to avoid liability?
Disclaimers can mitigate liability only if they are clear, prominent, and effectively correct any misleading impressions. Hidden or unclear disclaimers are insufficient.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific situation, please consult a qualified legal professional.