4.8

Google Reviews

Need Help? Contact An Australian Business Lawyer Today 1300 003 077

What Is Misleading And Deceptive Conduct in Australia?

Reading time: 6 mins

Misleading and deceptive conduct is a critical component of Australian Consumer Law. The prohibition against misleading and deceptive conduct is designed to ensure fair trading practices. It protects consumers and businesses from false or misleading representations.

This article was was written by our competition and consumer lawyer. We explore the legal frameworks governing misleading and deceptive conduct in Australia and key court cases.

Key Takeaways

  • Section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce
  • Businesses must ensure that all representations are accurate and not misleading
  • Consumers have the right to truthful information and can take action if they are misled
  • Upholding these laws promotes fair trading and enhances consumer confidence

Australian Consumer Law (ACL)

The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) is outlined in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. It serves as the cornerstone for consumer protection in Australia.

  • Section 18 of the ACL states: “A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.”
  • This provision applies to all individuals and businesses engaged in commercial activities, regardless of size
  • Importantly, the law does not require proof of intent to mislead; the mere likelihood of deception is sufficient.
Brooke is a senior Australian lawyer. Brooke is admitted to the Supreme Court of Queensland and the High Court of Australia

State and Territory Fair Trading Acts

Complementing the ACL are the State and Territory fair trading acts, which reinforce consumer protections at the local level.

  • Acts like the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) and the Fair Trading Act 1999 (VIC) mirror the ACL’s provisions
  • Consistent enforcement ensures that consumers and businesses across Australia are subject to the same standards regarding misleading conduct

Key Cases Shaping Australian Law

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191

This landmark case set important precedents in determining what constitutes misleading conduct. In particular, the High Court:

  • emphasised evaluating the conduct in its full context and considering the target audience’s perspective
  • established that misleading conduct is assessed based on the likely reaction of an ordinary and reasonable member of the public

Read full case here.

ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640

This case highlighted the importance of clarity in advertising. In particular, the High Court:

  • ruled that disclaimers must be prominent enough to dispel any misleading impressions
  • advertisements should not rely on fine print to correct misleading headlines or prominent statements. It is the overall impression of the representation that matter.

Read full case here.

Google Inc. v ACCC (2013) 249 CLR 435

This case examined liability concerning misleading advertisements in the digital space. In particular, the High Court:

  • found that Google was not responsible for misleading ads created by its advertisers
  • clarified that search engine providers are not publishers of the content but rather conduits

Read full case here.

Impact on Businesses and Consumers

Impact on Businesses

Legal Obligations

Misleading and deceptive conduct provisions have far-reaching impacts on Australian businesses. Firms are required to exercise vigilance in their marketing and sales practices to ensure representations are truthful and complete. Failure to adhere to these principles can result in significant financial penalties, reputational damage, and a loss of consumer trust.

Businesses must exercise due diligence to ensure all commercial representations are accurate and not misleading. To avoid conduct that is misleading and deceptive, Australian businesses should ensure that:

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the ACL can result in severe consequences. The consequences of breaching the ACL include:

  • significant fines being imposed by regulatory bodies like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
  • eroding consumer trust and harming brand reputation
  • litigation from consumers or competitors

Impact on Consumers

Rights and protections

Consumers are empowered under the ACL to make informed decisions. The prohibition against misleading and deceptive conduct offers protection against false representations that could impact their purchasing decisions.

Consumers are empowered to take action against businesses that engage in misleading practices. Remedies are available to consumers such as cancelling the contract or receiving compensation for loss they suffer.

Prosper Law provides tailored eCommerce law solutions to businesses in Australia

Taking Action

Consumers can take action such as:

  • talking to the advertiser directly to try and resolve their dispute
  • reporting misleading conduct to the ACCC or to the relevant State fair trading agency
  • seeking professional consumer law advice to pursue formal legal action

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is considered misleading or deceptive conduct?

Any action or statement that leads, or is likely to lead, a reasonable person into error is considered misleading or deceptive. This includes false representations, exaggerated claims, or omitting important information

No, under Section 18 of the ACL, intent is not a required element. Even unintentional conduct can be deemed misleading if it has the effect or potential effect of deceiving someone.

  • Keep records of all relevant communications and representations.
  • Attempt to resolve the issue directly.
  • If unsatisfied, lodge a complaint with the ACCC or state fair trading agency.
  • Consider consulting an eCommerce lawyer for further action.

Disclaimers can mitigate liability only if they are clear, prominent, and effectively correct any misleading impressions. Hidden or unclear disclaimers are insufficient.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your specific situation, please consult a qualified legal professional.

About the Author

Farrah Motley
Director of Prosper Law. Farrah founded Prosper online law firm in 2021. She wanted to create a better way of doing legal work and a better experience for customers of legal services.

Contact an Australian Business Lawyer Today.

Contact us for a free consultation

Contact Us For A Free Legal Consultation
About Prosper Law

We provide legal advice to business and individuals across Australia, no matter which State or Territory you are located. Our easy-to-access, online legal services mean that you can talk to our lawyers wherever you are, at a time that suits you.

4.8

Google Reviews

Get Your Free Guide Now
Need Legal Assistance?

Don’t hesitate – reach out for your free legal assistance today. Your peace of mind is just a click or call away!

Check Out Our Latest Blog Posts

Brooke is a Senior Lawyer with Prosper Law. Brooke is admitted to the Supreme Court of Queensland and the High Court of Australia
Competition Law

What it Means to Substantially Lessen Competition

The concept of “Substantially Lessening Competition” is a test used to determine whether certain conduct breaches competition laws in Australia. Substantially lessening competition refers to conduct that negatively impacts competition